The current model for managing family courts is extremely outdated and outdated. It was dominated by the chauvinistic view of marriage and parent-child relations in the 1950s. People should be emotional, robots - breadwinners, and women should be the guardians of the family and children. The woman is working now. The economy is in chaos, even those who do not have the burden of child support or maintenance are forced to do two jobs to make a living. Below, I propose 10 ways to substantially improve the fairness of family courts, which are more reflective of the reality in our modern culture and economy.
1. Delete the hypothesis: When a man and a woman enter the court, it is presumed that the woman is already the guardianship parent who should be raised by the child. The court should assume that the rights of both parents are equal. 50/50 joint custody should be presumed without authorization for child support.
2. Abolish Article IV-D of the Social Security Act: This law requires the federal government to provide $2 to the state government because they charge $1 for child support payments. This creates an automatic incentive for the court to set a higher child support metric. Granting bonuses to the states will not benefit the children, it will enter the "financing" fund. Under these circumstances, the state has no basis to obtain profits. It creates a conflict of interest.
3. Restrict the power of child support law enforcement agencies: CSEA administrators should not serve as judges. They should not issue and calculate child support orders. They have no right to try special circumstances, exempt from debt or deviate from normal norms. Pay more than $3 billion in annual taxes to taxpayers and maintain institutions that may not be at least or should be severely scaled down.
4. Equal representation: According to the Constitution, in criminal law, even if they cannot afford a lawyer themselves, defenders are entitled to agency. In child support cases, the state is a stakeholder with vested interests. The petitioner is supported by a child support law enforcement agency and paid to the state government through the Title IV sec D award. Although child support cases are technically considered "civil cases," the impact and complexity of family law is quite different; not to mention the involvement of children. If the court truly believes in the best interests of the child, they will seek to properly represent and protect both parents. Coaches who feel protected and considered are more likely to accept their responsibilities if they are not afraid and alienated. That's why I think both parents should assign advice to the court to give everyone the best deal. Happy parents = happy children.
5. Establishing non-custodial parents: According to my research, parents who are produced annually by national middle income [$42,000] are considered to be "high risk" of default. Fatehers or [NCP] with an annual income of less than $42,000 should have the option to complete a work plan rather than a sanction. If the court can provide a plan to help pay parents up to $42,000 a year, they will become "low risk" when they fall into default.
6. Cancellation of disability sanctions: Courts can decorate their wages, detain their bank accounts, liquidate their property, and do whatever you want to recover from arrears. However, do not suspend your driver's license or imprison him. In both ways, you strictly limit the ability of this person to earn income. They are caught in prisons, debt accumulation and destruction of resumes. No one wants to hire someone with a record. If you live in a city with limited public transportation, working back and forth can become very arduous and then limit employment opportunities. The debtor's prison was declared illegal for some reason. It is a crime to turn someone's child into a person's impersonation source. Although unmarried men are discriminated against, married men who are not raised for their children are left alone by the government. Find out why parents are unable to keep up with orders, and "the best interests of the child" makes it easier for parents to keep up with orders!
7. Let both parents choose to opt out: Women can legally kill their children through abortion, and because of the "safe haven law," they can also lay down their children at the fire station or police station without asking any questions. A woman who decides that she is not emotionally or economically prepared to be a mother can choose to choose her or her parents. The man was told to suck or face the prison. The parameters found in the states where abortion is permitted should also apply to men. Until a certain point, according to the law, a man should be able to dismiss his desire to become a parent like a woman. Many people will argue that it will create more sympathetic mothers, but we must consider many things. The federal government can spend $1 trillion on unconventional wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, but they complain that welfare spending is less than 5% of the federal budget? Also, who said the government must first distribute food stamps? If the federal government can provide them with $2 for each $1 child support, they can feed and feed the poor. The Federal Reserve has printed billions of dollars to save the business. Why not save the people?
8. The maximum amount and expenditure: If the guardian's parents can ask for 10,000 US dollars per month just because the rich are pregnant, and sometimes even get his house, this is outrageous! With the magic of "no-fault divorce," someone can legally be pregnant by a wealthy person, divorcing him for no reason, and occupying half of his assets for the next 18 years. The upper limit needs to be developed based on the cost of living in the state, so for those looking for a fast lottery, divorce is not motivated! In addition, paid parents need to have the tools available to supervise parents about how their money is spent. Guardian parents should receive a trackable prepaid card. Housing, food, day care, school supplies, medical expenses, clothes... these things are acceptable costs. However, if the guardian parent uses the card to purchase alcohol, holidays, television and other non-essential items, these fees will be questioned. This card system may create an argument that regulating parents needs more money and/or less money. Another option might be to use the remaining funds at the end of each month and have it automatically enter the child's trust fund and/or apply to the arrears.
9. Establish child visit enforcement agencies: Parental alienation is a huge epidemic. Without the help of the state government, doctors must spend thousands of dollars in legal fees to get basic child contact. If there is a child support law enforcement agency, if they are actively denied access, they need to have a non-custodial parent's agency or hotline. In many cases, due to legal costs, false injunctions and cooperative mothers, my father has not seen his children for many years.
10. Mediation first - Court second: Before the mother and father see the judge, they should be asked to participate in mediation first. Let workers use the child support model as a starting point and then allow each parent to discuss and negotiate with each other and achieve a satisfactory plan. If the parent does not communicate properly or later believes that the order is insufficient, the judge can step in and give his own calculation order. My point is to give parents a chance to solve problems without government intervention!
These are just some of my thoughts. The idea that we must punish and put people in jail applies only to those few who can afford to raise their children but choose to hide their assets or use deception. However, most of these laws, although intended to be good, ended up turning the middle class and the poor into criminal debt slaves.
Orignal From: 10 ways to improve the family court
No comments:
Post a Comment