Saturday, May 4, 2019

Why don't we teach grammar

First, the syntax is much like Kleenex®. The brand name has been associated with many other similar products. If I ask my wife "please pass the facial tissue, if she answers, I may feel annoyed," is the general organization good? "After all, I just want to sneer.

So let's agree on the meaning of grammar teaching. Grammar has become an all-encompassing term that refers to the fact that English teachers prefer to avoid all aspects of teaching. This includes a part of the sentence, the functions of these parts [such as part of speech], the word arrangement of sentences, word selection, punctuation and capitalization, and the weirdness we think students should know, but I hope they have learned it elsewhere, but why Most English art teachers hate teaching the set of teaching points that we call grammar?

We are afraid of the unknown. ELA teachers live in everyday fears, and one of our colleagues may ask us how to incorporate perfect word segmentation into our persuasive papers. Teachers naturally tend to avoid teaching things they don't understand. Most ELA teachers are trained to overheat love literature, poetry and writing [or at least one of three]. Few people have received training in grammar teaching. Over the years, some of us have learned some tidbits here and there, or have been educated in Catholic schools.

2. There is not enough time. The teacher has a complete list of standards and study courses on the "to do" list. Administrators, ubiquitous regional or state tests, and our own universities have the pressure to check the items on these lists. Of course, we have novels and projects that we like. Grammar teaching can't even be our top ten of Letterman. "If I have unlimited time...then, maybe. But to be honest... Socratic seminars, reader drama, Steinbeck's novels may first enter my curriculum."

"Research" says not to teach grammar. We removed the "sound bite" from one or two studies as a convenient excuse to avoid teaching grammar. We conceal the true language of the research conclusions, that is, "teaching grammar in isolation outside the context of meaningful writing is ineffective". Some teachers did accurately study these findings, but few actively deal with the variables of the study and actually teach grammar in the context of meaningful writing.

The fact that students are challenged by grammar is the fault of others. "Students should know these things now. The grade level standard emphasizes grammar review, not grammar. I can only teach what I should teach. I can't be responsible for the shortcomings of other teachers. If I spend all my efforts They should already know something, then the students will never learn anything new. I hope they can somehow pick it up later."

Students don't like grammar or remember their grammar. "The grammar is boring. I want to be a fun and interesting teacher. I am working hard for the teacher of the year, I will not let the grammar interfere. The students have learned that if their life depends on adverbs, then they cannot define or Identify adverbs and kill my students."

We don't know what we don't know. Teachers learn from their personal experiences and learn from professional development. Most teachers in their twenties, thirties, and forties have little grammar teaching during their school year, and because of the reasons already discussed, few university professors use grammar to train these teachers. In the 1970s, the "full-language" philosophy that prevailed in the 1980s and early 1990s no longer emphasized grammar teaching, but rather downgraded it to the editing process in the writing process. "I didn't study grammar, and I performed very well." For giving up grammar teaching, it is often considered rational, if not.

my reply? We need to teach grammar and make time for grammar teaching and practice. Everything a student needs to know must be "taught, not caught." Students are the people we teach, not the changing standards, learning courses, fashion, personal preferences or personal agendas. Therefore, if students don't know how to define, identify, and use adverbs, we need to teach them [an ambiguous pronoun reference that shows the subject and student adverbs]. Because of any "great grammar debate," we no longer need student casualties. Our ignorance is not an excuse. We need to learn how to teach grammar in a meaningful writing environment.

Why not understand grammar teaching through the course, which will help you to effectively integrate grammar into writing teaching? Throw away your ineffective DOL opening and last minute grammar test preparation exercises and teach all students the grammar, mechanics and spelling required for 75 minutes per week. Teaching grammar and mechanics provide a coherent scope and sequence of 64 unprepared courses, as well as teacher tips and hints for grammar challenges. The mechanics and grammar skills complement the content of the 72 TGM worksheet and assess the diagnostic needs indicated for multiple choices.




Orignal From: Why don't we teach grammar

No comments:

Post a Comment